<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Ai on Bill Glover</title>
		<link>https://old.bill.dev/tags/ai/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Ai on Bill Glover</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		
			<managingEditor>hello@bill.dev (Bill)</managingEditor>
		
		
			<webMaster>hello@bill.dev (Bill)</webMaster>
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 12:09:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://old.bill.dev/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Thoughts on AI</title>
				<link>https://old.bill.dev/2026/02/06/thoughts-on-ai/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 18:08:38 +0000</pubDate><author>hello@bill.dev (Bill)</author>
				<guid>https://old.bill.dev/2026/02/06/thoughts-on-ai/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;As I look around the co-working space around me, ‘AI’ is everywhere. To my left, someone on Zoom discussing the future of AI powered financial advice. To my right, two people pairing. Pairing on unpicking the mess generated by code generation. Directly in front of me, someone with two laptops. On one, Claude Code is burning through tokens while on the other they watch a show on Netflix.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I’ve found myself increasingly conflicted about Artificial Intelligence (AI). There appear to be two camps; the AI fanboys and the AI haters. Forced to pick one, I’d be closer to a hater than a fanboy. But I’m not forced to pick. My thoughts on AI are more nuanced. Not only that, they vary constantly. I’ll be honest, I find it difficult to avoid falling victim to recency bias, over-indexing on the most recent thing I’ve read. Unfortunately exposing myself to both extremes hasn’t helped me develop my own nuanced position. It’s left me feeling exhausted, bouncing around without settling. What &lt;strong&gt;do&lt;/strong&gt; I think about AI?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>@EmilyMBenderChatGPWhy2023</title>
				<link>https://old.bill.dev/notes/emilymbenderchatgpwhy2023/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 09:27:05 +0100</pubDate><author>hello@bill.dev (Bill)</author>
				<guid>https://old.bill.dev/notes/emilymbenderchatgpwhy2023/</guid>
				<description>&lt;div style=&#34;position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#x9;&#x9;&#x9;&lt;iframe allow=&#34;accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share; fullscreen&#34; loading=&#34;eager&#34; referrerpolicy=&#34;strict-origin-when-cross-origin&#34; src=&#34;https://www.youtube.com/embed/qpE40jwMilU?autoplay=0&amp;amp;controls=1&amp;amp;end=0&amp;amp;loop=0&amp;amp;mute=0&amp;amp;start=0&#34; style=&#34;position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;&#34; title=&#34;ChatGP-why: When, if ever, is synthetic text safe, appropriate, and desirable?&#34;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xA;&#x9;&#x9;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Author: &lt;a href=&#34;https://faculty.washington.edu/ebender/&#34;&gt;Emily M. Bender&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Full Title: ChatGP-why: When, if ever, is synthetic text safe, appropriate, and desirable?&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Slides: &lt;a href=&#34;https://faculty.washington.edu/ebender/papers/Bender-GRAILE-2023.pdf&#34;&gt;Bender-GRAILE-2023.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Talk: &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpE40jwMilU&#34;&gt;YouTube&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;notes&#34;&gt;Notes&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;There is a long list of examples of where the use of ChatGPT hasn&amp;rsquo;t turned out the way people expect.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Language form does not contain meaning and this explains why language models don&amp;rsquo;t understand.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Large language models are corpus models&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Claude Shannon worked on early language models&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Unigram language model models frequency of single words&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Bigram language model models frequency of words given previous word&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Trigram language model models frequency of words given previous two words&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Good uses for language models include:&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Spell checkers&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Machine transcription&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Machine translation&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Text input&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Neural networks are made of of perceptrons&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;A perceptron is a simplified model of a neuron&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Transformer architecture is an arrangement or perceptrons&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Language models use word embeddings&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The number of words in training data determines the size of a language model&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Generative AI is a mis-use of a classification and ranking tool&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Generative AI produces plausible output not intelligence&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;In order to determine whether a machine can understand and infer meaning, we need definitions understanding and meaning.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Language competency makes it hard to separate form from meaning&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Form refers to the marks on a page for language, the arrangement of pixels for images or video, etc.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Language meaning is the relationship between form and something external&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Understanding is the recovery of communicative intent from form&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Virtual assistants can understand limited instructions&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Language models exposed only to form can never learn meaning&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Language models do not learn the same way as babies&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Babies learn the relationship between form (sound, mouth movement) and meaning by forming connections with external cues that hint at communicative intent.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The Octopus Paper show that form does not contain meaning&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Large language models have a significant environmental impact&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Environmental cost of large language models impacts marginalised communities&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The contents of the internet do not represent a balanced view of humanity&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The young and those from developed countries are more likely to have contributed to the volume of work available on the internet.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Sampling the internet without bias is hard&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Large language models are too big&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Generative AI output does not contain communicative intent&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;We bring our own understanding to language form&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;When reading generative text, it is important to remember that the inference of meaning is our own.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;A Stochastic Parrot refers to the stitching together of form without meaning&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Coherence is in the eye of the beholder&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Synthetic text lacks accountability&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;There is no Who behind generative text&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Generative AI pollutes the information ecosystem&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Information retrieval is a terrible use-case for a large language model&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The more accurate generative text becomes the more dangerous it is&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Chatbots hide the sources of the information they regurgitate&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Responsible use-cases for generative AI include:&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;where the only thing that matters is form&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;text must not confuse author with a person&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;text needs to clearly articulate biases&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;consider labor practices&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;consider data theft&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Good use-cases for generative AI include:&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;a dialogue partner for language learning&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;a non-playable character&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;writing support&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Good use-cases for generative text must consider the costs&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Be a critical consumer of AI&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;We need to understand how the AI technology was evaluated in the context in which it is being used.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;We need to understand who benefits from the use of AI instead of a human?&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;You are responsible for your use of generative text&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;We must insist on transparency of source material in the training data.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Talk to students about what generative AI is&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Use of generative AI in education is a missed learning opportunity&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Use of generative AI by students indicates broader problem&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;further-information&#34;&gt;Further Information&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Three podcasts worth subscribing to on AI:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
